Cyber Shadows of Caracas

Venezuela Strike Fallout

Prepared January 6, 2026

Author: Luca Pellegrini – CEPRODE EUROPE

The Venezuelan flag in a cybersecurity threat: Symbolizing national risk in the digital world.

Download the full report here:

CyberShadows.pdf

Download PDF • 182KB

Introduction

On January 3, 2026, the geopolitical landscape of the Western Hemisphere was fundamentally altered when the United States executed a high-stakes military operation in Venezuela, resulting in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro. This kinetic strike, coordinated with cyber-enabled disruptions that crippled parts of Venezuela’s power infrastructure, sent shockwaves throughout global intelligence and military communities. But while the headlines focused on the swift decapitation of a regime, a far more complex, persistent, and invisible conflict was quietly igniting in cyberspace.

This report seeks to examine the immediate and long-term ramifications of that military intervention—not only as a conventional military event, but as a trigger point for a broader asymmetric retaliation across the digital domain. State-aligned cyber actors, or Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups, from nations such as Russia, Iran, North Korea, and Venezuela have been mobilized or activated in response to perceived aggression and ideological affront. This surge in activity signals a transition from isolated cyber intrusions to synchronized, retaliatory cyber warfare.

This report provides a granular and intelligence-informed analysis of the principal APT groups likely to retaliate or escalate cyber operations against U.S. and allied interests.

These include Sandworm (APT44) from Russia’s GRU, Machete (APT-C-43), Venezuela’s homegrown espionage entity tied to state security services, Iranian groups such as APT34 (OilRig), APT35 (Charming Kitten), and MuddyWater, and North Korean threat units including Lazarus Group and Kimsuky.

Each group’s operational structure, capabilities, malware arsenals, and geopolitical motivations are examined in detail, alongside their documented tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), many of which align with the MITRE ATT&CK framework. In doing so, the report identifies probable attack vectors, targeted sectors (such as energy, finance, military, and telecommunications), and outlines how multi-actor cyber operations could generate catastrophic cascading impacts.

What makes this scenario especially volatile is the convergence of ideological opposition to U.S. influence in the region, historical alliances (e.g., Venezuela-Russia oil and defense ties), and the technological maturity of cyber units that now possess the capability to match conventional power with disruptive code. Furthermore, the blurred lines between state-directed cyber actors and financially or politically incentivized criminal proxies further complicate attribution, deterrence, and defense.

Ultimately, this is not merely an account of retaliatory threats; it is a strategic intelligence dossier forecasting how cyber conflict will evolve in the wake of U.S. foreign interventions.

I will conclude with comprehensive threat forecasts, scenario planning, and actionable technical and policy recommendations aimed at helping governments, critical infrastructure operators, and allied intelligence agencies prepare for the digital repercussions of geopolitical escalation.

Sandworm (APT44) Profile

Sandworm, designated APT44 by Mandiant and Google Threat Intelligence, operates under Russia's GRU Unit 74455, transitioning from espionage to destructive sabotage since 2014.

The group coordinates with kinetic military operations, as seen in Ukraine where cyber attacks preceded physical strikes. In 2025, Sandworm escalated ICS/OT targeting with AcidPour wiper (data theft + destruction) and trojanized software via torrents, affecting Poland, Kazakhstan, and Russia. Initial access favors edge device exploits (routers, VPNs) and misconfigurations over zero-days, enabling reconnaissance, phishing, and wiper deployment. Post-Venezuela, Sandworm's Venezuela-Russia military ties (advisors, oil contracts) position it for proxy retaliation.

Sandworm's TTPs emphasize disruption: spearphishing with QR codes targeting Signal (2025), PsExec for lateral movement, ICS reconnaissance for maximum impact. Execution uses PowerShell/WMI, persistence via scheduled tasks/registry. Defense evasion includes polymorphic code, living-off-the-land (cmd.exe, rundll32). C2 leverages HTTPS/domain fronting with fast-flux DNS. Exfiltration precedes destruction via encrypted channels.

Recent evolution: integration with kinetic warfare, global collateral (NotPetya spread), new wipers combining theft/destruction.

Malware Arsenal

Sandworm's tools target OT/ICS: BlackEnergy (2015 Ukraine grid attack), NotPetya (2017 global $10B damage), Industroyer (SCADA disruption), VPNFilter (router malware), Cyclops Blink (WatchGuard compromise), ZEROLOT (2025 wiper). AcidPour (2025) steals data before wiping.

Machete (APT-C-43) Profile

Machete, active since 2010, is a Spanish-speaking espionage group targeting Latin America (Venezuela 50%+ victims), US, Europe. Suspected Venezuelan SEBIN-linked, it focuses military/political targets via forged documents. 2019 ESET analysis revealed 50+ active infections exfiltrating gigabytes weekly from Venezuelan military. TTPs: phishing with military docs, Python backdoors, surveillance (screen/audio/video capture, keylogging, geolocation). USB worms enable offline exfil. Infrastructure: Latin American ISPs, rotated domains. Post-strikes, Machete's regional focus enables rapid intel theft from US ops.

Machete leverages a mix of traditional espionage and cyber techniques. Their delivery is typically via spearphishing, often using zip files that masquerade as Adobe Reader installers bundled with malicious MSI payloads.

The group uses Python-based remote access tools, keyloggers, screen and audio capture utilities, and USB-based worms to enable offline data exfiltration from air-gapped systems. Persistence mechanisms include scheduled tasks and Windows registry modifications. Command-and-control is maintained through domains hosted on regional ISPs and rotating infrastructure, while evasion is achieved via custom encryption, obfuscation, and the use of hidden files.

Malware Arsenal

Machete employs a tailored malware suite primarily designed for covert surveillance and intelligence gathering rather than destructive operations. Its core tools include custom Python-based backdoors that enable file theft, screen and audio recording, keylogging, and clipboard capture. To maintain access and control, it uses persistence mechanisms such as scheduled tasks and registry modifications, along with anti-analysis techniques like obfuscation and sandbox evasion.

The group also deploys USB-based worms to target air-gapped systems, enabling offline data exfiltration. Credential harvesting capabilities include browser password dumpers and Windows credential access. Additionally, Machete uses modules for webcam activation and geolocation tracking, making it well-suited for real-time human surveillance.

Its command-and-control infrastructure is typically hosted via Latin American ISPs or compromised websites, using encrypted communications and fallback mechanisms for offline operations. Overall, Machete's malware is stealthy, modular, and customized per target—reflecting a highly focused espionage mandate.

Iranian APT Groups Profile

Iranian IRGC/MOIS groups (APT35, APT34, MuddyWater) exhibit persistence despite lower tech sophistication.

APT35 (Charming Kitten) uses AI phishing (GenAI PDFs), leaked docs show Exchange persistence/HUMINT loops targeting Lebanon/Kuwait/Turkey/Saudi.

APT34 (OilRig) hits energy/finance with HELMINTH backdoor, DNS tunneling, web shells.

MuddyWater deploys ZIP PowerShell, Cobalt Strike. 2025: heightened MENA ops, Ivanti/ProxyShell exploits. Venezuela ties enable proxy ops.

Malware Arsenal

The Iranian cyber ecosystem is characterized by persistent, adaptive, and resourceful threat actors, despite generally lower technical sophistication compared to top-tier APTs like those from Russia or China.

Iranian APT groups rely on custom malware, modified open-source tools, and modular attack frameworks to carry out long-term espionage and disruption campaigns, particularly against targets in the Middle East, the U.S., Europe, and, increasingly, Latin America.

APT34 (OilRig)

APT34, also known as OilRig, has built a diverse malware arsenal tailored for espionage in the energy, finance, telecom, and government sectors. One of its hallmark tools is HELMINTH, a backdoor delivered through malicious Microsoft Office macros or PowerShell payloads. HELMINTH comes in variants that use either HTTP or DNS tunneling for command-and-control, making detection difficult in enterprise environments. It allows attackers to execute commands, download additional payloads, and exfiltrate data in real time.

APT34 also uses QUADAGENT, a lightweight PowerShell-based implant that operates entirely in memory, reducing its forensic footprint. Additionally, APT34 has deployed web shells on compromised servers, allowing operators to maintain access via HTTPS while conducting stealthy post-exploitation activities. These shells are often disguised within legitimate-looking application files and are protected with multi-layered encryption and access control. The group frequently uses Living-off-the-Land Binaries (LOLBins) like cmd.exe, powershell.exe, and rundll32.exe to avoid detection, combined with credential theft tools such as Mimikatz and custom keyloggers. Its infrastructure typically employs rotating domain names, leveraging compromised servers for C2 and data staging.

Malware Arsenal

HELMINTH backdoor uses HTTP/DNS tunneling for C2, commands, and exfiltration via Office macros or PowerShell. QUADAGENT runs memory-only PowerShell for minimal footprint.

Encrypted web shells enable HTTPS access; LOLBins (cmd.exe, powershell.exe, rundll32.exe) aid evasion.

Mimikatz, keyloggers, PoisonFrog, and Karkoff handle credential theft; rotating domains support C2

APT35 (Charming Kitten)

APT35, also known as Phosphorus or Newscaster Team, specializes in targeted phishing and credential theft, often using well-crafted lures impersonating academics, journalists, or government agencies. In recent campaigns, APT35 has leveraged AI-generated documents and social engineering content (e.g., fake interview requests or event invitations), increasing the credibility of their phishing payloads.

APT35’s malware arsenal includes the PowerShell-based downloader known as PowerStats, which executes encoded scripts and drops secondary implants. The group also uses Android spyware such as DroidJack or custom backdoors targeting mobile users, particularly dissidents or foreign policy experts. For persistence and deeper access, APT35 has been documented deploying custom keyloggers, browser credential stealers, and tools that establish Exchange email persistence via OAuth token abuse or mailbox rule manipulation. In multiple campaigns, APT35 has used phishing pages that mimic login portals for Gmail, Yahoo, and corporate VPNs to harvest credentials. These are often paired with 2FA bypass tools, including real-time proxy-based phishing kits that relay login attempts and capture tokens as they are used.

Malware Arsenal

PowerStats: PowerShell downloader for staging implants.

Android spyware (DroidJack/custom): Targets mobile dissidents.

Custom keyloggers, browser stealers: Harvest credentials.

Mimics Gmail/Yahoo/VPN logins with 2FA proxy bypass and AI lures; abuses Exchange OAuth/mailbox rules.

Webshells, RATs (Saqeb/RAT-2AC2), and small-packet C2 for exfiltration and evasion.

MuddyWater

MuddyWater operates as a cyber-espionage and intrusion group known for its agility and rapid deployment of modified malware. Their primary malware families include POWERSTATS, SEASHARPEE, and MDT (MuddyWater Downloader Trojan). These tools are usually embedded in malicious Microsoft Office documents with VBA macros or delivered through ZIP archives with PowerShell scripts.

The group uses a multi-stage infection chain, often starting with PowerShell-based loaders that contact C2 servers, retrieve encrypted payloads, and install backdoors capable of keylogging, data collection, and command execution. In recent campaigns, MuddyWater has adopted Cobalt Strike, integrating it with their infection pipeline to gain lateral movement and privilege escalation within enterprise environments.

MuddyWater also employs multi-lingual phishing templates, allowing them to localize attacks based on region and target profile. Their malware leverages LOLBins extensively, and they have been known to disguise payloads inside signed binaries or use DLL sideloading techniques to execute code under the guise of trusted applications.

Their command-and-control infrastructure is designed for high redundancy, often including multiple fallback servers, SSL-encrypted channels, and steganography-based payload delivery.

Malware Arsenal

Multi-stage PowerShell loaders fetch encrypted payloads from redundant SSL C2 servers, enabling keylogging, exfiltration, and commands; recent ops add Cobalt Strike for lateral movement.

Uses LOLBins, DLL side-loading, signed binaries, steganography, and localized phishing for stealthy, adaptable attacks

North Korean APT Groups

The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) sponsors several offensive cyber units under its RGB (Reconnaissance General Bureau). Lazarus Group has been central to North Korea’s financial and disruptive cyber campaigns, responsible for SWIFT banking attacks, the WannaCry ransomware outbreak, and high-profile cryptocurrency heists valued at over $2 billion as of 2025.

Kimsuky, on the other hand, is a more espionage-centric unit, targeting South Korean, U.S., and Japanese diplomatic, academic, and strategic policy circles. Both groups have demonstrated adaptability, integrating AI-generated lures, polymorphic malware, and strategic deception operations in recent campaigns.

Lazarus typically employs spearphishing with malicious Word or HWP documents, often using geopolitical lures. Their toolkits feature backdoors, polymorphic droppers, and encrypted loaders. Execution relies heavily on LOLBAS such as certutil, mshta, and regsvr32, and they often establish persistence through scheduled tasks and hijacked system binaries. C2 infrastructure includes bulletproof hosting, fast-flux domains, and proxy chains. Kimsuky emphasizes credential harvesting, deploying fake academic surveys or impersonating think tanks, using malware such as BabyShark or the FPSpy implant to exfiltrate documents, audio, and keystrokes.

APT Groups and Malware Arsenal

Lazarus

Lazarus deploys spearphishing with malicious Word or HWP documents using geopolitical lures, followed by polymorphic droppers, backdoors, and encrypted loaders. Common techniques include LOLBAS execution via certutil, mshta, and regsvr32 for persistence through scheduled tasks and hijacked binaries, with C2 over bulletproof hosting and fast-flux domains.

Recent adaptations incorporate AI-generated lures and tools like DYEPACK for banking manipulation, NESTEGG trojans, and VIVACIOUSGIFT payloads.

Kimsuky

Kimsuky prioritizes credential theft via fake academic surveys and think tank impersonations, deploying implants like BabyShark and FPSpy for document, audio, and keystroke exfiltration. Their toolkit emphasizes espionage with credential-harvesting malware and social engineering, evolving to polymorphic variants and AI-enhanced deception.

Shared Tactics

Both groups demonstrate adaptability with polymorphic malware, proxy chains, and strategic lures, blending financial gain with intelligence objectives under DPRK sponsorship

Target & Risk Assessment

APT10 (China): While not directly involved in the current report, strategic Chinese interests in Venezuela’s rare earth and oil sectors could trigger cyber surveillance operations.

APT29 (Cozy Bear): Russia may deploy this more stealth-oriented unit in parallel with Sandworm for long-term espionage and HUMINT gathering in NATO and OAS countries.

FIN7 or Evil Corp: Financially motivated groups may exploit the chaos to launch ransomware campaigns under political cover.

Building Cyber Resilience

Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA): Governments should adopt ZTA across all defense, energy, and diplomatic networks to mitigate lateral movement and credential compromise.

Segmentation of ICS/OT Networks: Physically and logically isolate operational technology layers from IT infrastructure to reduce exposure.

Threat Intelligence Fusion Centers: Integrate civilian, military, and private-sector intel sharing using platforms like MISP or OpenCTI for real-time collaboration.

Mandatory Red Teaming: Enforce regular adversary simulation exercises using threat emulation from MITRE ATT&CK to harden response capabilities.

Cyber Diplomacy Frameworks: Bolster international treaties under the UN or OAS to classify retaliatory cyberattacks as violations of sovereignty.

Critical Infrastructure Cyber Reserve: Establish national-level reserves of vetted civilian cybersecurity professionals ready for emergency deployments.

National Attribution Doctrine: Develop a clear doctrine outlining thresholds and public attribution timelines to reduce confusion and preempt escalation.

Institutionalizing Cyber Crisis Governance in a Fragmented Global Order

Following the strike in Venezuela, multiple geopolitical actors are poised to retaliate in cyberspace. Intelligence suggests that aligned APTs, such as Russia’s Sandworm, Iran’s APT34 and APT35, and North Korea’s Lazarus Group, may collaborate or act in parallel to destabilize U.S. and allied infrastructure.

The threat extends beyond simple retaliation. Coordinated attacks against energy grids, financial clearinghouses, and defense logistics could be executed using previously implanted malware and AI-generated decoys.

These campaigns may also employ false-flag tactics, obscuring attribution by mimicking Chinese, Israeli, or Western APT indicators.

Additionally, groups like Machete could expand their operational scope by activating regional criminal proxies or hacktivist fronts, escalating threats across Colombia, Panama, and the Caribbean.

Engagement of other organizations

APT groups not yet involved may soon enter the fold. APT10 (China) has long targeted Latin American telecom and resource sectors and could intensify surveillance and access operations.

Russia’s stealthier unit APT29 (Cozy Bear) may parallel Sandworm by focusing on long-term espionage against NATO and OAS entities. Financially motivated actors like FIN7 or Evil Corp may use the chaos to deploy ransomware with geopolitical cover.

Recommendations

To counter these threats, states must adopt Zero Trust Architecture, strictly isolating operational technology from enterprise IT systems.

Behavioral EDR/XDR platforms should be deployed with focus on anomaly detection. Intelligence fusion centers must link civilian and military signals and incorporate deception platforms such as honeynets to trap lateral movement.

On the governance front, nations must institutionalize cyber crisis protocols, set attribution policies, and codify cyber response doctrines within NATO, OAS, and the UN.

Establishing a Critical Infrastructure Cyber Reserve, comprised of pre-cleared cybersecurity professionals, can help respond during crisis escalation.

Organizations should prioritize continuous threat hunting using AI-driven tools to proactively scan for APT indicators like anomalous PowerShell execution or unusual DNS tunneling, enabling early detection of groups such as Sandworm or OilRig.

Implementing supply chain risk management frameworks, including vendor vetting and software bill of materials (SBOM) enforcement, counters edge device exploits common in Venezuelan strike fallout scenarios.

Additionally, fostering public-private partnerships for shared cyber threat indicators via automated ISAC platforms accelerates collective defense without relying solely on government-led reserves.

As cyberspace becomes the first-strike domain of modern conflict, preemptive resilience, agile intelligence, and international solidarity will define whether democracies can withstand this asymmetric digital war.